There are very strict rules about what goes into a court bundle. For FDA it is an ES1 and ES2, chronology, and statement of issues. Where possible these should be agreed. Questionnaires from each party, if relevant, each party's forms G and H. Then there is a section of procedural documents - applications, orders and court notices. Another section would include Forms E without enclsures.
There may be a small number of additional documents if they are relevant to the hearing and relate to a potential dispute.
A position statement may be prepared in support of any specific directions that are sought as may a draft order.
The main purpose of FDA is administrative. It is aimed at ensuring all the relevant financial information has been gathered and clarified so that FDR can be fruitful. FDR is the hearing at which offers are discussed, negotiation takes place and the judge can indicate what a
fair settlement would look like. You can settle by consent or if you cannot agree, will be sent on to final hearing.
You may well be asked to discuss the proposed order ahead of the hearing. If it can be agreed, then there's no need for a hearing. It will be done as a paper exercise. NB directions at an FDA are fairly standard
Judges have a duty to treat LIPs fairly. Some are better than others. You may well find the barrister does a lot of the talking. If you haven't agreed things like
FMH value, you may be asked if agreement can be reached at the hearing. If not, a formal valuation will be ordered.
A lot does depend on the individual circumstances of the case.
If you are unable to afford a solicitor, it may be worth looking at our divorce consultant service. We can guide you through the court process, help with paperwork etc.
Hadenoughnow